Originally Posted by: NotAMod Originally Posted by: negative1 new order has sunk further and further down since low-life, with nothing coming close to even that.
Well that's all subjective and personal taste, isn't it? Low-life's a great record but the band recorded and released a slew of great songs post-85. Almost undeniable. I personally found the naughties-era albums to be a bit patchy but when even they hit their high points they could be pretty special. Also, if New Order truly stopped being a good band for you in 1985 why do you devote so much time to them on these forums and documenting all of their releases post-85? Some fans prefer to take refuge in the "generally accepted best" particularly the Factory era but I personally find stuff like Crystal, Who's Joe, Turn, I'll Stay With You, Academic and Singularity to be close to or better than a great deal of that older stuff.
if you noticed, i concentrate mostly on their single releases, and associated songs, not necessarily their albums.
to me they have always been a 'singles' band, and there have been plenty of those, with releases, re-releases,
and multiple mixes of songs.
and the ones i prefer the most are from the 80s.
Originally Posted by: NotAMod Originally Posted by: negative1 the new order box was a toss up, except for the bonus disc, and even then, just average
Retro bar the bonus disc was a wasted opportunity. The band didn't seem interested, the label were border-line uninterested and it ended up being dropped in the lap of a few celeb mates to compile. The concept was definitely flawed and just didn't seem to work. The bonus disc was a last minute panic because they knew it had ended up a fairly random compilation of commonly-available stuff most fans already had. This new box-set which has been mooted in the music press is a brilliant opportunity to right that wrong. It's a chance for the fans to finally get a New Order archival release that will stand the test of time. I wish them all the best and hope they get it right.
there is little to no hope for a great boxset to come out, because there is too much material to sort out.
so far the fan compilations do a much better job, because of the variety of material available, and the research, and
care taken to put them together,
Originally Posted by: NotAMod Originally Posted by: negative1 orchestral concerts.
Can't think of anything worse, truly. But then that's just me. It's personal preference but I've found bands performing live with orchestras can be very hit and miss. Maybe I've seen the wrong ones. That said the studio orchestral bits on Music Complete do work well and don't interfere with the sound too much. The arrangement on Tutti Frutti for instance really works.
my point was, there is a lot more variety in echo and the bunnymen shows.
they have a lot to draw from.... so does new order,
but if you notice, they concentrate solely on their early era songs.
rarely, if any songs, from the last 5 albums make it into the concerts.
and even if they play them, there is rarely any variation in the songs, they have a lot more variety and improvisation in their early concerts from the 80s.
there would be little to no interest, if new order played only new songs, or even the majority of them.
they realize the strength of their appeal, is their back catalogue.
Originally Posted by: NotAMod Originally Posted by: negative1 bernard has lost a lot of his voice
Bollocks. I've seen the band regularly(ish) recently and even if you read reviews of recent gigs people have had a lot of compliments for Bernard's recent vocal performances. They're vastly better than they were during most of the Get Ready and Sirens' gigs. The whooping has gone which has greatly improved how the songs come across. Besides, do you seriously expect Bernard to sing exactly as he did in 1985 or 1989? That's just incredibly naive. He's sixty now so expecting him to belt out Age Of Consent exactly as he did in 1983 is a bit misguided. I think Music Complete demonstrated on a few tracks he's found his feet with singing in a lower register, he sounds pretty good on Nothing But A Fool. His lower range seems to have "come of age" for sure.
You do have a point with the recent sets being a tad repetitive but they have introduced newer songs (Lonesome, Academic) and new arrangements (WFTSC, BLT) so it's a bit unfair to say they've been totally static. At the end of the day not everyone going to their gigs are hardcore fans like us. Some people want to hear Blue Monday and the more established songs and would feel disappointed if they were omitted so 50 people in the front row could enjoy "The Happy One".
i have heard, and seen new order a few times in the last several years, along with echo. i've listened to the recordings, and watched them for both bands.
no, i do not expect them to sound like they did 30 years ago, but all things considered, i think ian has held up better overall compared to bernard.
one thing about new order, is that they do sound better live now, and not as 'raw' as they used to when they first started, and bernard is not as off-key as he used to be.
later
-1
Edited by user 22 March 2016 11:44:41(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified