logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
perspexorange  
#1 Posted : 01 February 2018 05:08:18(UTC)
perspexorange

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 2,380
Location: Salop

Thanks: 504 times
Was thanked: 3848 time(s) in 2380 post(s)
I remember reading on the 'Recycle' blog that there are differences between the 12" and LP versions of 'Fine Time', a fact that I was completely unaware of for 20 years or more.

I seem to think that, at the time of finding out, I checked the two versions and could hear some differences. However, now that I am listening to them again, I can't spot anything obvious.

Can anyone with younger / better ears point me to the bits of the mix that differ?

Ta.
thanks 1 user thanked perspexorange for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC)
Sponsor
Debaser  
#2 Posted : 01 February 2018 05:50:24(UTC)
Debaser

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,118
Location: here n there

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 3199 time(s) in 2140 post(s)
Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post

Can anyone with younger / better ears point me to the bits of the mix that differ?

Nope, soz. But while we're asking questions on this track... What does the vocodor-y voice at around 2.41 sing? "Edit bossin' edit, fuckit", or something?

thanks 1 user thanked Debaser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC)
Mr Discography  
#3 Posted : 01 February 2018 05:51:25(UTC)
Mr Discography

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 391
Man

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 755 time(s) in 392 post(s)
Slightly different sound/sample at 1:17-1:19 is the only difference. Always wondered if this was intentionally different to the LP version, or if an alternate mixdown was used by mistake on one or the other? I prefer the sample on the 12", FWIW.

This particular section is edited out of the seven inch version.
thanks 2 users thanked Mr Discography for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC), perspexorange on 01/02/2018(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#4 Posted : 01 February 2018 07:24:41(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Debaser Go to Quoted Post
What does the vocodor-y voice at around 2.41 sing? "Edit bossin' edit, fuckit", or something?



According to Smash Hits (so it must be true), it's 'Acid man, acid man, acid man, acid box it man.' True Dylan.
thanks 1 user thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC)
50 Pound Note  
#5 Posted : 01 February 2018 08:00:24(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post
However, now that I am listening to them again, I can't spot anything obvious.


At the 1:17 mark on the 12", the sound is more of a guitar bend/slide. Higher pitch, sharper sound, a little disorienting. At the same mark on the LP version it's 3 guitar chords strummed, with a flanger effect on them.
thanks 2 users thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC), perspexorange on 01/02/2018(UTC)
50 Pound Note  
#6 Posted : 01 February 2018 08:01:32(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Debaser Go to Quoted Post
Nope, soz. But while we're asking questions on this track... What does the vocodor-y voice at around 2.41 sing? "Edit bossin' edit, fuckit", or something?


"The past doesn't matter."
thanks 2 users thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC), perspexorange on 01/02/2018(UTC)
lee  
#7 Posted : 01 February 2018 11:34:19(UTC)
lee

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 19/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 211
Location: the middle of nowhere

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 331 time(s) in 212 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Michael Monkhouse Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Debaser Go to Quoted Post
What does the vocodor-y voice at around 2.41 sing? "Edit bossin' edit, fuckit", or something?



According to Smash Hits (so it must be true), it's 'Acid man, acid man, acid man, acid box it man.' True Dylan.


i'm sure they said "acid box it man...acid box it man....acid box it man"
thanks 1 user thanked lee for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 01/02/2018(UTC)
perspexorange  
#8 Posted : 01 February 2018 14:06:43(UTC)
perspexorange

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 2,380
Location: Salop

Thanks: 504 times
Was thanked: 3848 time(s) in 2380 post(s)
Many thanks for the responses everyone. I knew someone would know.

As for that sample, I really can't make it out. Even with the Smash Hits lyrics posted above, my ears can't pick it out.

I learned something else new about the song today though. According to this page http://www.neworderonlin...usic/Song.aspx?SongID=25 , the track's name came from this:

Steve Morris: "We finished the record off in Bath, and the reason why it's called Fine Time was because my car had been towed away and I had to remind myself to go and pay the fine. I just wrote "Fine Time" on this piece of paper to remind myself to go get it and thought, that's a good title."

I'd never heard that story. I guess it beats 'The Happy One', 'Mr Disco' and 'MTO (Mid Tempo One)' (those being working titles to differentiate tracks, which were never replaced with better names).
thanks 2 users thanked perspexorange for this useful post.
fac51 on 02/02/2018(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
perspexorange  
#9 Posted : 01 February 2018 14:19:11(UTC)
perspexorange

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 2,380
Location: Salop

Thanks: 504 times
Was thanked: 3848 time(s) in 2380 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Music Complete Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Debaser Go to Quoted Post
Nope, soz. But while we're asking questions on this track... What does the vocodor-y voice at around 2.41 sing? "Edit bossin' edit, fuckit", or something?


"The past doesn't matter."


I think you're right. Nice. Another thing I've learnt today.
thanks 1 user thanked perspexorange for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
Mr Discography  
#10 Posted : 01 February 2018 14:59:47(UTC)
Mr Discography

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 391
Man

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 755 time(s) in 392 post(s)
I read somewhere it was just 'Ecstacy man' repeated, which you can also kind of hear. I think Bernard whispers 'Ecstacy' along with it on the 'Retro' live version.
thanks 1 user thanked Mr Discography for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
Johnny James  
#11 Posted : 02 February 2018 02:15:32(UTC)
Johnny James

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 451
Location: UK

Was thanked: 1044 time(s) in 451 post(s)
Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post
Many thanks for the responses everyone. I knew someone would know.

As for that sample, I really can't make it out. Even with the Smash Hits lyrics posted above, my ears can't pick it out.

I learned something else new about the song today though. According to this page http://www.neworderonlin...usic/Song.aspx?SongID=25 , the track's name came from this:

Steve Morris: "We finished the record off in Bath, and the reason why it's called Fine Time was because my car had been towed away and I had to remind myself to go and pay the fine. I just wrote "Fine Time" on this piece of paper to remind myself to go get it and thought, that's a good title."

I'd never heard that story. I guess it beats 'The Happy One', 'Mr Disco' and 'MTO (Mid Tempo One)' (those being working titles to differentiate tracks, which were never replaced with better names).


MTO had a working title of 'MT One', and this was probably more to do with the Roland MT-32 that was used throughout Technique.

Mr Disco was 'Disco One', you'll be surprised to learn.

Edited by user 02 February 2018 02:18:48(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 2 users thanked Johnny James for this useful post.
fac51 on 02/02/2018(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
Debaser  
#12 Posted : 02 February 2018 05:57:01(UTC)
Debaser

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,118
Location: here n there

Thanks: 528 times
Was thanked: 3199 time(s) in 2140 post(s)
Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post
my car had been towed away and I had to remind myself to go and pay the fine. I just wrote "Fine Time" on this piece of paper

Knew this.

Originally Posted by: Music Complete Go to Quoted Post
At the 1:17 mark on the 12", the sound is more of a guitar bend/slide. Higher pitch, sharper sound, a little disorienting. At the same mark on the LP version it's 3 guitar chords strummed, with a flanger effect on them.

Didn't know this, but totally hear it now, thanks. I think I prefer the album verison. Fine Time isn't a "Rock" track but that bit on the 12" sounds more "Rock" than the album version. Incidentally I just had a listen to the Steve Silk Hurley and Messed Around mixes. They're rubbish! Haven't aged well at all.
Fun Fact: Around 2012 the Chemical Brothers used to play their own re-edit of Fine Time in their DJ sets. It was quite good.

Originally Posted by: Music Complete Go to Quoted Post
"The past doesn't matter."


I should have checked the lyrics websites; they all have "the past doesn't matter" (mind you, they do tend to crib off each other). I think I'm I'm going with this; I will sleep easier at night now!
thanks 1 user thanked Debaser for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
50 Pound Note  
#13 Posted : 02 February 2018 12:59:08(UTC)
50 Pound Note

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/09/2015(UTC)
Posts: 174
Location: San Francisco

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 274 time(s) in 174 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Debaser Go to Quoted Post
Fun Fact: Around 2012 the Chemical Brothers used to play their own re-edit of Fine Time in their DJ sets. It was quite good.!


I know Steve hates this song, and it would probably be a real pain to re-sequence, but I've always loved it and wish it would make a return to the live set.
thanks 1 user thanked 50 Pound Note for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
perspexorange  
#14 Posted : 04 February 2018 01:56:51(UTC)
perspexorange

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 20/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 2,380
Location: Salop

Thanks: 504 times
Was thanked: 3848 time(s) in 2380 post(s)
I remember feeling disappointed when I first heard the track.
I have no idea why as, a few listens later, I thought it was bloody brilliant. I still do.

Although it probably wouldn’t (quite) make my personal top ten, I think I’d rate it as one of the band’s most important tracks.
thanks 1 user thanked perspexorange for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
Fotzepolitic  
#15 Posted : 04 February 2018 02:51:50(UTC)
Fotz

Rank: Dead Soul

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/08/2014(UTC)
Posts: 2,657
Location: Down on the farm

Thanks: 678 times
Was thanked: 3737 time(s) in 2658 post(s)
Originally Posted by: perspexorange Go to Quoted Post
I remember feeling disappointed when I first heard the track.
I have no idea why as, a few listens later, I thought it was bloody brilliant. I still do.

Although it probably wouldn’t (quite) make my personal top ten, I think I’d rate it as one of the band’s most important tracks.




Yeah i remember too being massively disappointed when i first heard it, i thought it was utter crap.Mind you it was the 7" version i heard first on Radio 1.When i got my hands on the 12" i liked the track a lot more.It was great live back in the day.
thanks 1 user thanked Fotz for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse  
#16 Posted : 04 February 2018 06:15:26(UTC)
Michael Monkhouse

Rank: Guilty Partner

Groups: Registered
Joined: 03/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,998
Location: Rome

Thanks: 61 times
Was thanked: 2410 time(s) in 2004 post(s)
I always had a soft spot for Fine Time. (I also have a soft spot for the Spice Girls, but that's old age.) It might be Technique's weakest single (even track) but it was a perfect intro to the new Balearic sound, especially after the Pointless Waste Of Time that was BM 88. The video was suitably mental and with typical modesty, Wilson considered the TOTP appearance the UK's intro to acid... Wendy James said it was 'very acid house'. She's so astute, I see how she got into the biz.
News of a Spice Girls reunion just leaked. So did I when I saw the picture.
thanks 2 users thanked Michael Monkhouse for this useful post.
79order on 04/02/2018(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 05/02/2018(UTC)
Blue 5  
#17 Posted : 06 February 2018 03:48:55(UTC)
Blue 5

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 16
Location: London

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 24 time(s) in 16 post(s)
I never really liked this track, but thought Don't Do It was a nice B side.

It never stopped me buying the 7", 12" and remixes (which I think are better).

The thing that did impress me about the 12" was the weight of the vinyl. I don't know if I got a mutant pressing but it was about twice the depth of a regular record.

I always thought it was weird, especially considering how short the content was. Typical Factory.
thanks 1 user thanked Blue 5 for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 06/02/2018(UTC)
Rocket Mick  
#18 Posted : 06 February 2018 08:08:23(UTC)
ROCKET MICK

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 219

Thanks: 37953 times
Was thanked: 229 time(s) in 126 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Blue 5 Go to Quoted Post
I never really liked this track, but thought Don't Do It was a nice B side.

It never stopped me buying the 7", 12" and remixes (which I think are better).

The thing that did impress me about the 12" was the weight of the vinyl. I don't know if I got a mutant pressing but it was about twice the depth of a regular record.

I always thought it was weird, especially considering how short the content was. Typical Factory.


I have just checked mine with the silver inner sleeve. Same as yours and again the run off groove on the A side is bloody huge. More than a Fine LINE. It took me till i saw them at G.Mex to start liking the track.

thanks 1 user thanked ROCKET MICK for this useful post.
Blue 5 on 07/02/2018(UTC)
markreed  
#19 Posted : 10 February 2018 13:07:28(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
I never understood why FT didn't get more love. Certainly when they played it live - even in 1998 - it was an utter monster of a track.

I always enjoyed the Steve Hurley mix as it felt like he was trying to make a 'extended' 12" mix like the previous N.O. 12" A-sides.

I spliced together a long version taking as many of the unique elements from the various 12"s, LP, and 7" here : https://www.mixcloud.com...-time-fine-time-re-edit/ and became very familiar with the original mixes.

It's a fascinating construction that feels like its several songs all at once.
thanks 2 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 11/02/2018(UTC), Rorschach on 12/02/2018(UTC)
negative1  
#20 Posted : 11 February 2018 07:51:41(UTC)
negative1

Rank: Member with Substance

Groups: Registered
Joined: 24/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,186

Thanks: 934 times
Was thanked: 1778 time(s) in 1188 post(s)
To me, fine time, was a weird experiment that failed for new order.

There was nothing 'new orderey' about it, and in fact, it seemed more like a joke when it was released.

I'm surprised it got as far as it did when it came out.

Definitely not worthy of being a single.

later
-1
thanks 1 user thanked negative1 for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 11/02/2018(UTC)
markreed  
#21 Posted : 11 February 2018 09:23:45(UTC)
markreed

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 02/05/2012(UTC)
Posts: 229
Location: Somewhere, GB

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 353 time(s) in 229 post(s)
I get fairly tired of the constant negativity sometimes. In no way was FT a failed experiment. The band were young, loaded with tech and were involved in one of the most influential nightclubs in the world. If you think the band weren't going to get ripped to the tits on drink and drugs and then try to write songs that sounded like their hazy memory of a batshit crazy Saturday night out at the peak of their hedonism that's quite innocent. Also, they were recording and writing in that well known monastery of chaste prudence : Ibiza

Also, NO never did what they were told or what anyone else expected at that point. I never knew with any NO song whether it was going to be a 10 minute disco epic or a three minute bleeding heart guitar track. If they'd released Round & Round as the first single from Technique, no doubt someone would say it was just a lame rip off of TBTHOG and the band had run out of ideas. If they'd spent their career trying to live down to other peoples demands and produce an identikit run of songs that sounded like the old ones, they could have had a fate worse than Simple Fucking Minds.

Fine Time was always a great end to a sweaty night out when they played it, and the record sounds great to me now, and that's probably the best you can hope for from a song unless Bob Dylan wrote it.

thanks 6 users thanked markreed for this useful post.
The Shadow on 11/02/2018(UTC), Col72 on 11/02/2018(UTC), perspexorange on 11/02/2018(UTC), ROCKET MICK on 12/02/2018(UTC), LostSiren on 12/02/2018(UTC), Rorschach on 12/02/2018(UTC)
Rorschach  
#22 Posted : 12 February 2018 04:00:49(UTC)
Rorschach

Rank: Member of the Brotherhood

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 268
Location: Salford

Thanks: 610 times
Was thanked: 394 time(s) in 266 post(s)
Fine Time is an odd one and a divisive one and always has been.

When it first came out in 88, I really loved it but the girl in my 6th form class who had introduced me to much of Neworder, absolutely hated it because "it's not Neworder to me." She had an import 12" single which she kept wrapped to protect it's value (and because she hated the song.)

I bought the 12" as soon as it came out and really got into the Messed Around mix and the Silk mix. When Technique came out, I was, for a very short time, a little disappointed that FT was not more representative of the sound of the whole album (!)

Over the years, I kinda went off FT and saw it as a bit of an incongruous & skippable opener the my all time favourite album before recently growing to appreciate it (and Fine Line) once again.

I've never had a problem with it being a single though. It was of its time and the TOTP appearance was a good laugh. Also, the FT single gave us the utterly majestic Don't Do It, so I can't and won't complain.

Edited by user 12 February 2018 04:03:31(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 1 user thanked Rorschach for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 12/02/2018(UTC)
LostSiren  
#23 Posted : 12 February 2018 04:02:25(UTC)
LostSiren

Rank: Member of the Republic

Groups: Registered
Joined: 01/08/2013(UTC)
Posts: 182
Location: Boston

Thanks: 35 times
Was thanked: 231 time(s) in 182 post(s)
Originally Posted by: markreed Go to Quoted Post
I get fairly tired of the constant negativity sometimes. In no way was FT a failed experiment. The band were young, loaded with tech and were involved in one of the most influential nightclubs in the world. If you think the band weren't going to get ripped to the tits on drink and drugs and then try to write songs that sounded like their hazy memory of a batshit crazy Saturday night out at the peak of their hedonism that's quite innocent. Also, they were recording and writing in that well known monastery of chaste prudence : Ibiza

Also, NO never did what they were told or what anyone else expected at that point. I never knew with any NO song whether it was going to be a 10 minute disco epic or a three minute bleeding heart guitar track. If they'd released Round & Round as the first single from Technique, no doubt someone would say it was just a lame rip off of TBTHOG and the band had run out of ideas. If they'd spent their career trying to live down to other peoples demands and produce an identikit run of songs that sounded like the old ones, they could have had a fate worse than Simple Fucking Minds.

Fine Time was always a great end to a sweaty night out when they played it, and the record sounds great to me now, and that's probably the best you can hope for from a song unless Bob Dylan wrote it.


Here here!
Fine Time is not only a song I still love, but at the time it was right in line with what I thought was so cool about NO - they just did things how they wanted. It was completely unexpected to me when I heard it and I still love them for that. I probably listen to Technique start to finish at east once a week
thanks 1 user thanked LostSiren for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 12/02/2018(UTC)
Alexey Fyodorovich  
#24 Posted : 18 February 2018 16:26:16(UTC)
Alexey Fyodorovich

Rank: Candidate

Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: Los Angeles

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 20 post(s)
I feel like I need to chime in here and add that I always loved Fine Time; like good Acid House it sounds irreverent and somewhat insane. And yes, I think the different guitar sound at 1'17" is the only difference between the LP and 12" versions (discovered that by accident one day and was quite surprised).
thanks 1 user thanked Alexey Fyodorovich for this useful post.
ROCKET MICK on 18/02/2018(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.1 | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.077 seconds.