Originally Posted by: Fotz Think i made the mistake though of watching it when i was tired and sleep deprived as my attention drifted at times.Or maybe the film is too long.
I don't think you're alone in thinking that the film was too long. And most reviews (certainly from fans) have been pretty critical, with most mentioning that there are very few action scenes, which isn't really ideal for a superhero flick. So I don't think it's necessarily your fault for drifting off; that appears common to quite a few people who've seen it.
It's a shame as I had high hopes for the film a few months back, liking Gal Gadot (hubba-hubba!!!), the character and the time period.
The first film was pretty reasonable too (although I think it was let down by being a bit 'CGI' at the end).
Talking of films being too long, I think this is a common problem with films these days, especially the Marvel ones. They seem to want each film to be 2.5 hours long.
I kind of blame Christopher Nolan for this with his Dark Knight Trilogy. Not that his films felt too long to me. They seemed about right.
It's just that, as they were so successful both critically and commercially, it seems that every director feels a superhero movie should be about that length (or thereabouts).
I just remember all the great action films of the 1980s / early 1990s being less than 2 hours long:
Predator (1h47m)
Terminator (1h47m)
Total Recall (1h53m)
etc.
Everything seems to go on at least 30 mins longer than it needs to.
Rant over...
Edited by user 31 December 2020 13:13:05(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified